We thank a gentleman who assists at Masses hosted by the Our Lady of Good Success Mission for recording these videos of the sermon and conference given by Fr. David Hewko on Sunday March 15, 2015 in Milton, Ontario.  Audio only versions of the sermon and conference were first posted here.

 

 

 | Posted by | Categories: Sermons |

Solemnity of St. Joseph

19 March 2015

On behalf of the Our Lady of Good Success Mission, I wish you all a most blessed Solemnity of St. Joseph.

 

GIF3

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.ca/2015/03/entrevista-exclusiva-al-rp-faure.html
 
Translated by Michael cruzadoparalaverdad@gmail.com
 
Exclusive Interview with Fr. Faure
 
How about a little history to begin, Father, how did you get to know Tradition and Archbishop Lefebvre?
 
In 1968, while in Argentina, I visited the Archbishop of Paraná, lowest dumped me: “Do you want to defend Tradition In the Council I Defend Tradition together with a brave Bishop, a friend of mine, Archbishop Lefebvre.” It was the first time i had heard of Archbishop Lefebvre. I Went to look for Archbishop Lefebvre in Switzerland in 1972, and During Holy Week Went I was first met him there.
 
Where were you born? Why were you living in South America?
 
I was born in Algeria and my family, after the independence, acquired a plot of land in Argentina, close to Paraná. My family was Deported from Algeria Because The French government seceded power to the militant Moslems That-committed horrendous massacres During the course of the process of the independence. My grandparents, parents and uncles Worked in agriculture there since 1830.
 
Returning to the story, how your apostolate in the Society come about?
 
Archbishop Lefebvre ordained me in 1977 in Ecône, and 15 days later I Went With Him on a trip-through the southern United States, Mexico (where the government refused our entry), Colombia, Chile, and Argentina. The Archbishop put me in charge of starting an apostolate in esta region. During the first year two Argentinian Priests helped me and the following year another Spanish priest (of the Society). After esta as the South American district of the United States was FORMED as was my position and re- sponsibility and I Began to preach retreats far north as Mexico. The first year Vocations That There Were 12 Were put in the Priory of Buenos Aires That was in a large enough house. Following esta, around 1980, the seminary in La Reja (Buenos Aires) was built, Where Archbishop Lefebvre put me as rector. I stayed there Until 1985, When I was named superior of the District of Mexico. That was When They built the churches in Mexico City and Guadalajara. I looked after the country and Its distinct places together With Frs. Calderon, Angles, and Tam. Later I was in France for some years. After all of this I was named as professor of history in the Seminary in Argentina and I was there Until the expulsion of Bishop Williamson from Argentina (2009).
 
Did Archbishop Lefebvre confide in you?
 
Archbishop Lefebvre Gave me free access to His mail and correspondence and I have put me in charge of Un Certain records. I had a Un certain kind of trust for me in 1977 in Albano’ve Asked me what I thought acerca consecrations. In This opportunity I have confided in me that “They are waiting for me” (the rector in Econe and the professors). They would Suggest accepting the New Mass and the Council in order to preserve the Tridentine Mass They Said to him. “Now we are Confronted with Rome If we keep the Mass (Traditional) we must accept the Council..” They tried to persuade the Archbishop to retire in a beautiful house in Germany, but I Told Them That They Were free to leave If They wanted to. I got rid of them.
 
Is it true That Archbishop Lefebvre Asked you to accept Being consecrated a bishop?
 
In 1986, while on a visit to Econe, I’ve called me aside after a meal and Asked me if I would accept Being consecrated a bishop. Knowing what Happened, I suppose I must accept.
 
Then you did not accept?
 
That I Told him it Seemed to me Bishop De Galerreta That would be the MOST adequate.
 
Can you summarize what Happened in 2012?
 
In That year we were very close to an accord and it failed at the last moment, probably, Because Of The issue with Bishop Williamson. The deal failed Because of that matter and the letter of the three bishops. Both of These Caused the deal to fail.
 
It is Said That the key to the ad intra strategy of Bishop Fellay is the backside of the General Chapter. Can you tell us something acerca this?
 
The General Chapter was very well prepared by Bishop Fellay and the They (the accordistas) Accomplished Their objectives To. That was when i HAD Understood what Archbishop Lefebvre and his friends felt like in the Second Vatican Council. Bishop Fellay HAD taken the decision of a policy of getting close to Rome and I HAD fixed it in order to Have the the overall support of the Chapter in expelling Bishop Williamson, lowest was the only one capable of obstructing esta policy.
 
According to your judgment, What Should be the conditions required to make a deal with Rome?
 
Archbishop Lefebvre while Told us That There Were not real Changes in Rome a deal would be impossible, Because in Original People were not loyal, and one can not just intend to change one’s superiors. It is the cat chases the mouse and That not The Mouse That chases the cat. A deal would be equal to handing oneself over to the modernists, and consequently, it must be absolutely refused. It is impossible. We must wait for God’s intervention.
 
Can you tell us what you think the visits of evaluation of various modernist prelates to the Seminaries of the Society? Is it true That eleven Archbishop Lefebvre Received some prelates? What is the difference now?
 
It Dealt With exceptional visits During Which Cardinal Gagnon Never Had The Possibility of defending the Council, while on the other hand it deals now With The first steps of a reintegration (of the Society) into the conciliar church.
 
What do you think acerca an eventual unilateral recognition on the part of Rome to the Society?
It is a trick.
 
Between the 2006 chapter and the crises started in 2012 Un Certain Changes are Observed and attitudes of the Authorities of the Society Of St. Pius X in RESPECT to Rome? What is the reason for esta change?
 
It is the decision of esta appears to be reintegrated into the conciliar church. Since 1994 or 1995 There Were some context With GREC That Were significant steps Towards a reconciliation, like what HAD Been With The ambassador Perol seen (above dealer tatie of France in Italy) who is the inventor of the lifting of the excommunications (2009) and the Motu Proprio (2007). That must have another relative HAD Recognizing act of the Council.
 
What would Archbishop Lefebvre do in the current situation?
 
I would follow in the line That I Indicated to us after the consecrations, doing away Completely With The Possibility of a deal.
 
If in the future You Were invited to go to Rome and speak With The pope would you go? What would you say?
 
First, I would consult With all of my friends in the resistance. I would go With Bishop Williamson and the other excellent Priests That accept the combat of the resistance With much value. And I would keep all of our friends well-informed With all transparency.
 
Bishop Fellay has Said That the Society is in agreement With 95% of the Second Vatican Council. What do you think of this?
 
Archbishop Lefebvre That answered all of the Council is invaded by a subjectivist spirit That Is not Catholic.
 
Is Francis, Being an Effective devastation of the Church and objective destroyer of the Faith, a true pope?
 
In my view, it can not be Said That Francis is worse than Paul VI, lowest Who Put The Church was on the wrong course, and so we must conserve That was the attitude of Archbishop Lefebvre the same, a prudential attitude sedevacantism That excluded. Archbishop Lefebvre always refused to ordain a seminarian That was sedevacantist. And That was the policy in the SSPX Until His death. So do not let it be Said That the Archbishop Said did this or that.
 
What is the state of the process of your expulsion from the Society?
 
The last news That I HAD Heard was by chance a second warning in an email. After tomorrow, Therefore, the Society of St. Pius X will again have 4 bishops! They better throw me out quickly. Deo Gratias!
 
This decision of consecrating a bishop Been must’ve thought acerca and meditated During much time. Just like Archbishop Lefebvre, you, Bishop Williamson and the Priests of the resistance Have not wanted to Collaborate in the destruction of the Church. It is for conserving the faith intact That They Have Persecuted you all, Condemning you all and calumniating you all many times. Your episcopal consecration Could run the risk of an Alleged RESULTING in excommunication. What Were the Main Reasons for bringing business acerca de esta consecration?
 
The main reason Is That That We can not leave the resistance without bishops. Just like Archbishop Lefebvre Said, Catholic bishops are essential for the conservation of the true doctrine and faith and the Sacraments.
 
Archbishop Lefebvre thought of you in the consecration of bishop and now Bishop Williamson is Finalizing esta wish. What will be your main Concern?
 
Maintaining the strength of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre and the way That I HAD Went, without deviating too much to the right or to the left.
 
Where will your place of residence be?
 
In France Reviews where we Have Been Thinking About opening a seminary close to the Dominicans of Avrille.
 
Would you like to say any words to the Priests and faithful That are still under the structure of the society but are not satisfied That With The liberal ways in the last years?
 
That They Return to meditate upon read into the texts of Their founder.
 
Can you Explain to us the essential of your coat of arms?
 
In the sensuous is the lamb of apocalypse Alpha and the Omega and the lamb of God That Takes away the sins of the world Announced by Isaiah. The hearts are symbols of the Vendee martyrs and the revolution and the fleur de lis is the emblem of Catholic France. The motto, ipsa cónteret (she will crush you) is taken from the Vulgate, Genesis 3, 15 Where God promises the victory of the Virgin Mary Against the dragon.
 
Is there anything more you would like to add?
 
We keep Faith, Hope, and Charity. There is nothing to Doubt and we must beg of God and Our Lady That we are maintained in in Original virtues.

 
Father, we thank God Greatly, His Most Holy Mother, and Saint Joseph protector of the Church for esta great grace. We ask of God That I May protect and conserve you. We thank you for Having accepted esta Tremendous position and consecrating Bishop Williamson for you as one of the successors of the Apostles. Deo Gratias!
 

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

http://www.dominicainsavrille.fr/pourquoi-un-sacre-en-2015/#more-3196
 
March 18
 
Why a Consecration in 2015?

 
by Dom Thomas Aquinas OSB

 
Why a consecration in 2015?
Because the situation remains essentially the same as in 1988. Modernist Rome, which manifested itself at the Council, remains in place and becomes more and more modernist and liberal. The profound perversion of the mind is only intensifying.
 
But why not wait for the Society of St. Pius X to give us bishops?
Because the authorities of the Society have taken a new direction in relations with Rome.
 
Do you mean to say that the Society has abandoned the true faith or the fight for the faith?
I mean to say that the leaders of the Society have gradually in recent years, and especially since 2011 and 2012, taken a new direction in their relations with Rome.
 
But the question is whether or not the Society has abandoned the fight for the faith. What do you think?
The particularity of liberals is inconsistency. The current leaders of the Society have made the fight of the Society inconsistent. The healthy part of the Society is trying to fight this battle as in the past, but the dominant wing, its Superior General at the top with Fr. Pfluger, persecute those who want to continue this fight as before.
 
Do you have any proof of that?
It is all too abundant. The refusal to ordain the Dominican and Capuchin candidates at the appointed time in 2012 is one. The Benedictines of Bellaigue were also threatened.
But much more serious and significant was the scandalous expulsion of Bishop Williamson, preceded by the order to cease the Eleison Comments. In fact Menzingen does not tolerate us opposing its new orientation. Menzingen does not want us to publicly continue the fight for the faith as before, following Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer.
The district priests are closely monitored and their articles cannot be published without quite strict permission.
 
But what harm is there in that? Every institution must monitor what is being said in its name!
Not like that. We must punish those who write against the Catholic faith, but not install a regime like the one Bishop Fellay already did.
In addition, those with a liberal tendency have broad permission to write, while the book of Father Pivert is removed from sale. Le Sel de la Terre is frowned upon and removed from press stands. The most faithful priests are disavowed or even punished or expelled.
Unfortunately, examples abound. The list is already long enough, while the GREC was able to work peacefully and Father Pfluger gives his scandalous interviews without being disturbed.
 
But there are good articles in Le Chardonnet, for example. Isn’t it wrong to say that the anti-liberals are persecuted in the Society?
Yes, there are still some good articles in Le Chardonnet, and not only in Le Chardonnet. Unfortunately, this is far from preventing the accordist tendency of Menzingen to move forward.
 
Do you mean, basically, that Menzingen is betraying the fight for the faith?
Yes, Menzingen is betraying the fight for the faith. That is why a consecration has become necessary to assure the continuity of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre, especially as Bishop Fellay now refuses to ordain candidates opposed to his policy, as is the case for several religious communities of men to whom he also refuses the Holy Oils (necessary to baptize children and give extreme unction to the dying). “We continue,” very simply, as Archbishop Lefebvre used to say. And we believe that good Catholics support us from the bottom of their heart.
If we seem to be too hard towards Menzingen, take the time to go through the long series of events that have marked the history of Tradition in recent years and you will see that the two most combative bishops of Tradition were, one, expelled from the Society, the other, silenced, at least in part. Added to this are the iniquitous trials of Fr. Pinaud and Fr. Salenave, and still so many facts.
 
What do you think about the candidate chosen?
He was chosen by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988. He proposed another name. It is to his credit. Today he accepts this heavy burden. We are deeply grateful to him.
 
To conclude, let us also and especially give our gratitude to Bishop Williamson who knew how to protect and transmit the legacy received from the hands of Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer, which is none other than the deposit of the faith entrusted by Our Lord to the Apostles.
A final appeal. Read the works ofArchbishop Lefebvre. Everything is there. Read also the Eleison Comments to understand the seriousness of the current evil.
Corçâo said: “Only the saints believe in evil.” Deep words which are a warning. May Our Lady help us to see the evil where it is, to work with her, she who has always crushed the head of the infernal serpent. “Ipsa conteret.” That is the motto of the one who, God-willing, will tomorrow be Bishop Jean-Michel Faure. May Our Lady bless him and protect him “ad multos annos”.

 
 

18 MARS
Pourquoi un sacre en 2015 ?
par dom Thomas d’Aquin OSB

Pourquoi un sacre en 2015 ?
Parce que la situation reste essentiellement la même qu`en 1988. La Rome moderniste qui s`est manifestée au Concile reste en place et devient de plus en plus moderniste et libérale. La perversion profonde de l`esprit ne fait que s`accentuer.
Mais pourquoi pas ne pas attendre que la Fraternité Saint-Pie X nous donne des évêques ?
Parce que les autorités de la Fraternité ont pris une nouvelle orientation dans les rapports avec Rome.
Voulez-vous dire par là que la Fraternité a abandonné la vraie foi ou le combat de la foi? Je veux dire que la direction de la Fraternité a pris progressivement au cours des dernières années, et surtout depuis 2011 et 2012, une nouvelle orientation dans ses rapports avec Rome.
Mais la question est de savoir si oui ou non la Fraternité a abandonné le combat de la foi. Qu’en dites vous?
Le propre des libéraux est l’incohérence. Or la direction actuelle de la Fraternité a rendu le combat de la Fraternité incohérent. La partie saine de la Fraternité essaye de mener ce combat comme par le passé, mais l’aile dominante, son Supérieur Général en tête avec l’abbé Pfluger, persécutent ceux qui veulent continuer ce combat comme avant.
Avez-vous des preuves de cela ?
Elles ne sont que trop abondantes. Le refus d’ordonner les candidats dominicains et capucins à la date prévue en 2012 en est une. Le bénédictins de Bellaigue aussi ont été menacés.
Mais beaucoup plus grave et significatif a été la scandaleuse expulsion de Mgr Williamson, précédée de l’ordre de cesser les Commentaires Eleison. En fait Menzingen ne supporte pas qu’on s’oppose à sa nouvelle orientation. Menzingen ne veut pas qu’on continue publiquement le combat de la foi comme avant, à la suite de Mgr Lefebvre et Mgr de Castro Mayer.
Les prêtres des districts sont surveillés de près et leur articles ne peuvent pas sortir sans des permissions assez strictes.
Mais quel mal y a-t-il en cela? Toute institution doit surveiller ce qui est dit en son nom !
Pas comme cela. On doit punir ceux qui écrivent contre la foi catholique, mais pas installer un régime comme celui que Mgr Fellay a déjà fait.
En outre, ceux de tendance libérale ont des larges permissions pour écrire, tandis que le livre de l’abbé Pivert est retiré de la vente. Le Sel de la terre est mal vu et retiré des stands de presse. Les prêtres les plus fidèles sont désavoués, ou même punis, voire expulsés.
Malheureusement les exemples ne manquent pas. La liste est déjà assez longue, alors que le GREC a pu travailler en toute tranquillité et que l’abbé Pfluger fait ses interviews scandaleuses sans être inquiété.
Mais on trouve des bons articles dans Le Chardonnet par exemple. N’est-il pas faux de dire que les anti-libéraux sont persécutés dans la Fraternité?
Oui, il y encore des bons articles dans Le Chardonnet, et pas seulement dans Le Chardonnet. Malheureusement, cela est loin d’empêcher la tendance accordiste de Menzingen d’avancer.
Voulez-vous dire au fond que Menzingen est en train de trahir le combat de la foi?
Oui, Menzingen est en train de trahir le combat de la foi. C’est pourquoi un sacre est devenu nécessaire pour assurer la continuité de l’œuvre de Mgr Lefebvre, surtout que Mgr Fellay refuse maintenant d’ordonner des candidats opposés à sa politique, comme c’est le cas pour plusieurs communautés religieuses d’hommes, à qui il refuse aussi les Saintes Huiles (nécessaires pour baptiser les enfants et extrémiser les mourants). « On continue », tout simplement, comme Mgr Lefebvre avait coutume de dire. Et nous sommes persuadés que les bons catholiques nous donnent raison au fond de leur cœur.
Si nous semblons être trop durs envers Menzingen, prenez le temps de repasser la longue série des faits qui ont jalonné l’histoire de la Tradition ces dernières années et vous verrez que les deux évêques les plus combatifs de la Tradition ont été, l’un expulsé de la Fraternité, l’autre mis au silence, en partie au moins. A cela s’ajoutent les procès iniques des abbés Pinaud et Salenave, et encore tant et tant de faits.
Que dites vous de l’élu?
Qu’il a été choisi par Mgr Lefebvre en 1988. Il avait alors proposé un autre nom. C’est tout à son honneur. Aujourd’hui il accepte ce lourd fardeau. Nous lui sommes profondément reconnaissants.
Pour conclure disons aussi et surtout notre gratitude envers Mgr Williamson qui a su protéger et transmettre l’héritage reçu des mains de Mgr Lefebvre et de Mgr de Castro Mayer, qui n’est autre que le dépôt de la foi confié par Notre-Seigneur aux Apôtres.
Un dernier appel. Lisez les œuvres de Mgr Lefebvre. Tout y est. Lisez aussi les Commentaires Eleison pour comprendre la gravité du mal actuel.
Corçâo disait : « Il n’y a que les saints qui croient au mal ». Parole profonde qui est un avertissement. Que Notre-Dame nous aide à voir le mal où il est pour travailler avec elle, elle qui a toujours écrasé la tête du serpent infernal. « Ipsa Conteret. » C’est la devise de celui qui, si Dieu le veut, sera demain Mgr Jean-Michel Faure. Que Notre Dame le bénisse et nous le garde « ad multos annos ».
 
 

Translation by Unbrandable

 
 

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

Dear Father Girouard:
 
A spiritual bouquet for your birthday from some members of the Resistance.
 
Happy Feast of St. Patrick, too.
 
God bless,
 
Patricia
 
 
Dear Patricia,
 
Thank you very much, and please convey my greatest thanks to all those who contributed to this beautiful Bouquet! I am very impressed with the numbers you have been able to come up with, and I feel much comforted to know I am having such devoted people praying for me.
 
Nothing new here, in our little corner of the world. But with God’s help and your prayers, we are holding fast to a truth without compromise.
 
My best encouragements to the Toronto Resistance!
 
God bless you all,
 
Father Girouard
 
 
St.Patrick

Pax et Bonum

 

Sister Michaela Raphaela TOSF

 
 

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

The March 2015 issue of the Recusant is now available here for download.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized | Tagged: |

On Sunday March 15, 2015 in New York State, Br. Leo was received by Fr. David Hewko into the Third Order Secular of St. Francis as a postulant.  Deo gratias!

 

We welcome him to the Fraternity of St. Mary of the Angels.

 

The fraternity members list has been updated.

 | Posted by | Categories: T.O.S.F. |

 
St. Patrick
 
http://catholicplayground.com/patrick/saint-patrick-coloring.html
 
 
Sr Catherine
 

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

A Religion Test

17 March 2015

A student who attends a NO high-school told me this two weeks ago:
 

In a Religion test, he was asked to choose one correct answer
from the following choices:
 

The Story of Creation is
 

a) a historical fact

b) a religious fact

c) a scientific fact

 
You can email me your answer, and I will let you know how you scored.
 

Pax et Bonum,
 

Sister Catherine, TOSF
 

Sermon (Social Reign of Jesus Christ the King)

 

Play:

 

 

Download:

2015 03 15 – Fr. David Hewko Sermon – Fourth Sunday of Lent – Milton, ON

 

Conference

 

Play:

 

 

Download:

2015 03 15 – Fr. David Hewko Conference – Milton, ON

 | Posted by | Categories: Sermons |