Resistance Update

5 May 2013

As you know, we have Father Hewko coming next Sunday. If you want to hear what he has been saying recently, have a look at this channel:


Father Pfeiffer preached this sermon in Australia on the 24th to good reviews:


In it, he compares the SSPX (non-Resistance) priests to the prophet Jonah and details the lack of pastoral care offered by that prophet. He compares the SSPX priests of the eighties to the current batch and and concludes that the current group are too comfortable and lack the right attitude. He outlines how they got that way.


It looks like this youtube channel


replaces one that has been closed (by NoelChristie). There are many sermons excellent from the tour of Australia here, as well as many Catholic movies.


Father Pfeiffer’s tour has had some unexpected results. In India, a chapel that hosted Father had their priest reassigned by Father Couture and advised that the SSPX would no longer provide the sacraments. The priest saw that the Faithful would no longer have the sacraments, so he joined the Resistance and will provide for them. The Resistance picked up a few Indian priests. ( Further, people in Australia who hosted him are being refused the sacraments. This may become a new trend, so those of you who still go to SSPX Masses should be aware of the likely consequences.


Bishop Fellay’s letter to the Pope last June (published in the Cor Unum of March) is available here:


This letter clearly indicates that Bishop Fellay working towards a practical agreement in advance of a doctrinal agreement. The Doctrinal Declaration ( indicates that he accepts the validity and the licitness of the NOM. As a result, one must conclude that the SSPX leadership no longer warns against our going to the NOM (since it is licit), conditional ordinations and confirmations are no longer necessary, the state of necessity no longer exists and therefore supplied jurisdiction no longer applies. The Resistance sees things a little differently.


When I asked one priest if he has read the Cor Unum, he indicated that is was junk. But, being a warrior, he will stay inside to fight. How does one fight while being slowly cooked?


Bishop Fellay promised an explanation of the doctrinal declaration would be published in the March Cor Unum. It has not been made available to the Faithful. We do not need to know?


If we can conclude that supplied jurisdiction no longer applies to the SSPX (according to the new approach of the leadership) then why do we not need to know? Is there a fault with this conclusion?


Why are people still going to the SSPX Masses? Yes, the Mass should be valid and graces are available. However, as indicated in the sermons of the Resistance Priests, God wants us to understand and conform to the Doctrine. If you have the Faith, graces will be provided. God likes to be generous. We cannot go where the Teaching is being watered down and may becoming a threat to our faith.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

Click on this link and download the conference by Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer given on April 27, 2013 in Sydney, Australia.  In this conference, Fr. Pfeiffer speaks about the four marks of the Church and how they have been disappearing from the SSPX over the course of time.  This is a must listen to.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

Click on this link and download the sermon by Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer given on April 26, 2013 in Adelaide, Australia.  In this sermon, Fr. Pfeiffer makes it clear that resistance to Menzingen’s new direction should be out in the open and not behind anonymous figures.  I agree with this.  The time for private or anonymous resistance is over; rather, the time is ripe for open war for the sake of the Faith!

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized | Tagged: |

Here is a piece I wrote a couple of months ago demonstrating the collapse of the position of the current SSPX leadership in regards to protecting the SSPX from the control of the Diocesan Bishops.


This piece was also published in the March 2013 issue of the Recusant.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized | Tagged: |

Listen here to an extract of a sermon given on April 26, 2013 by a true son of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Fr. David Hewko, instructing us that we must rather die than agree to the treacherous Doctrinal Declaration of Bishop Fellay dated April 15, 2012.


A thank you goes out to Pablo the Mexican for providing the audio.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized | Tagged: |

A Case in Point

30 April 2013

Question:  Some people say, “Yes, but Archbishop Lefebvre should have accepted an agreement with Rome because once the Society of St. Pius X had been recognized and the suspensions lifted , he would have been able to act in a more effective manner inside the Church, whereas now he has put himself outside.”


Archbishop Lefebvre:  Such things are easy to say. To stay inside the Church, or to put oneself inside the Church – what does that mean? Firstly, what Church are we talking about? If you mean the Conciliar Church, then we who have struggled against the Council for twenty years because we want the Catholic Church, we would have to re-enter this Conciliar Church in order, supposedly, to make it Catholic. That is a complete illusion. It is not the subjects that make the superiors, but the superiors who make the subjects.


The above is an extract taken from an interview given by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre to Fideliter magazine and published in its July/August 1989 issue.  Note how the Archbishop makes it clear that to think we could enter the conciliar church in order to make it Catholic is a complete illusion.  Yet today we have the superiors of the SSPX stating the opposite of what the good Archbishop emphatically claimed, despite the fact that these same superiors were once on board with his position.  These superiors now claim that we must join them in order to beat them!  The irony of it all is that the way the current SSPX superiors have acted towards those who have spoken out against a canonical regularization and the way most of these priests (and faithful) have responded have only demonstrated how right the Archbishop was. 


Back around the Spring/Summer of 2012, two bishops and several priests had spoken out against a canonical regularization, but where are they now?  After the July 2012 General Chapter, they are no longer fighting the good fight.  Some of them have even come to make excuses for the SSPX leadership or, even worse, have jumped on board the Bishop Fellay train.  There are also those priests who watched from a distance and never took a public stance one way or another, but were privately against a canonical regularization.  They cringed at the way their brother priests had been treated for speaking out.  I am sure many of us know some of these priests as we had come to respect them in their preaching of the truth and defence of the Faith prior to this SSPX crisis.  We thought them to be warriors.  However, to our disappointment, they never took a public stance in agreement with their private one.  Instead, they became either too busy making excuses for the SSPX leadership or have also jumped onto the Bishop Fellay train, albeit with one foot still not firmly entrenched on it.  Then, several weeks ago, the April 15, 2012 Doctrinal Declaration of Bishop Fellay came to light.  We thought we finally had what we needed to clearly demonstrate that Bishop Fellay had deviated, no longer simply from a position of prudence but from Catholic doctrine itself.  Our confidence was even further strengthened when Bishop Williamson, unjustly booted from the SSPX, wrote an open letter to SSPX priests that they ought to speak out against Bishop Fellay’s Doctrinal Declaration for the sake of the faithful.  “Yes!  The priests have to speak out now”, we declared.  But….unfortunately….’til this day, there has been hardly a whimper coming from the priests.  Instead, we hear Resistance priests telling us that they had spoken to several priests who had either defended Bishop Fellay’s Doctrinal Declaration or had brushed it off.  What a disappointment! 


I ask, “What has happened to the SSPX of old?  Where did it go?”  Barring a miracle, I think it is now safe to say that it has gone down the memory hole.  I hope to be proven wrong, but I am afraid not.  The slide of the SSPX will continue until it is in the arms of conciliar Rome.  And most of priests will go along for the ride until they find themselves at a point of no return.  Very sad indeed – the years after Vatican II all over again. 


Archbishop, you were right.  The superiors do make the subjects.  What has transpired in the past year within the Society you founded is just a case in point.                                        

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized | Tagged: |

You may find here a commentary on the treacherous Doctrinal Declaration of Bishop Fellay dated April 15, 2012 and submitted to Rome.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

Leaders of the Neo-SSPX

23 April 2013

A few leaders of the neo-SSPX (Bishop Fellay, Fr. le Roux, Fr. Wegner, and Fr. Rostand – I don’t know the priest in the middle) smile for the camera while the saintly Archbishop, to whom these leaders claim fidelity, rolls over in his grave for what they are doing to the society of priests he founded.  Let us pray that these leaders come back to the position of the SSPX’s saintly founder.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized | Tagged: |

Please note that the Catholic Resistance in Canada website address has changed to:


For those websites that have linked to our site, please change the link accordingly.

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |

Dear Friends,


In the link below you can hear an excellent sermon by a true son of Archbishop Lefebvre, Fr. David Hewko.


In this sermon, Father compares Bishop Fellay’s Doctrinal Declaration of April 15, 2013 to Judas’ selling out Our Lord for 30 pieces of silver!  Yes.  Not only has Bishop Fellay betrayed Archbishop Lefebvre, but infinitely more important he has betrayed Our Lord by his Doctrinal Declaration.  And yet to this day there is no public retraction of that Declaration.   His latest letter to friends and benefactors doesn’t say a word about it.  Instead it pretends that he is and has always remained faithful to Our Lord and the Archbishop.  How long will the priests of the SSPX refuse to speak out on such treachery?  Were they not molded for the precise reason of defending the Faith?  Is this not a grave failure in their duty?  It has been several weeks since the Declaration has been made public and we have heard hardly a whimper.  It is very disappointing.  The fight goes on nevertheless.  Let us wholeheartedly support Bishop Williamson and those priests who have felt the axe of Menzingen simply for doing their duty.


For the Reign of the Sacred and Immaculate Hearts!

 | Posted by | Categories: Uncategorized |