Authenticity of “The Flying Squirrel” Questioned

There are some who are questioning the authenticity of the existence of “The Flying Squirrel” newsletter published by the SSPX in India.  Here is an extract of a conference given by Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer in Veneta, Oregon on January 12, 2014.  Fr. Pfeiffer seems to have no doubt that it exists.  I don’t doubt it either.  If someone can prove Fr. Pfeiffer and me otherwise, I will retract my posts and apologize.


You can directly listen to the audio by left clicking on the “Play” button.  If you prefer to download the audio file to your computer, right click the “Play” button and then left click the “Save audio as” option.

“Vatican II Crucifies Christ to the Cross” – Fr. David Hewko

Here is an extract of a sermon given by Fr. David Hewko in Sparta, New Jersey on January 5, 2014.  We cannot reconcile Vatican II with Catholic Tradition.  Compare this to Bishop Fellay’s hope that Vatican II would be considered a part of Tradition.


You can directly listen to the audio by left clicking on the “Play” button.  If you prefer to download the audio file to your computer, right click the “Play” button and then left click the “Save audio as” option.

Call to Holy Hour for France to Help The Resistance

I would like to endorse the attached call for a holy hour (or at least a Rosary) for the intention stated.


Father Pfeiffer explains why in this conference:


He also explains that many priests in France will be going public on Sunday with their displeasure with the leadership of the SSPX. Included with these priests is a canon lawyer who wrote a book containing many writings of Archbishop Lefebvre – a book which is now banned by Bishop Fellay. However, the French Superior refuses to ban the book and may be close to joining the Resistance. If so, many French priests would join him. This is still a maybe – hence the request for prayers on Thursday.




Begin forwarded message:

From: Sean et Carla

Subject: Holy Hours

Date: January13, 2014 at 6:36:37 PM EST

To: undisclosed-recipients:;


Dear friends,


A happy and holy New Year 2014 to all! May the Child King, His blessed Mother and Saint Joseph keep us faithful despite the difficulties, temptations and discouragements.


First of all, some news concerning last June’s Letter to the Four Bishops which you signed. Two of the four kindly replied:

– Bishop Williamson sent a kind message thanking us for the initiative and the magnificent spiritual bouquet.

– Followed by an encouraging letter from Bishop Tissier de Mallerais thanking all for the “precious” prayers and the letter which he tells us was “favourably read and heard, and to a large extent acceded to in our common declaration [of 27th June 2013]  “.


Each of us might judge, in the light of events since then, if indeed our letter was “favourably read, heard” or “to a large extent acceded to” by the General Superior…


A new direction now seems to be definitively imposed upon the members of the SSPX by Menzingen and all contestation  is severely reprimanded. Yet this new direction is eminently contestable and it should be easy to understand the necessity to combat it. We therefore should like to relay the initiative (cf : ) which follows calling for prayers for the numerous courageous priests and the few superiors who have chosen to fight, each in his own way, that they may filled with the gift of Fortitude to resist the coercions and punishments they have been imposed or which may await them.


In Christo Rege.



Continuous Holy Hour


Thursday, 16th January 2014, feast of Saint Marcel 1st , pope and patron saint of Archbishop Lefebvre, all day from 0:00am to 11:59 pm.


For the intention of the Father de Cacqueray, District Superior of France,

and of all the priests who want to remain faithful

that they may fully accept the demands of the combat for the Truth



“Father de Cacqueray needs our help” according to Father Rioult who states that “he is one of the few major superiors who measures the exceptional gravity of the situation of the Society”. The faithful priests too need our help to fully accept, whatever the cost, all that the combat for Truth requires of them. What better help could we offer than our fervent and generous prayer?


We therefore invite you to partricipate in a continuous holy hour this Thursday 16th January feast of Saint Marcel 1st , Pope and patron saint of Archbishop Lefebvre, all day from 0.00am to 23:59pm. Might Saint Marcel and the founder of the SSPX intercede to obtain from the Holy Ghost that Fr de Cacqueray be filled with the gift of Fortitude and have, according to the expectations of the faithful and clairvoyant clergy, a strong and beneficial reaction in these troubled times . And might the Holy Ghost fill with the same Fortitude those priests who want to remain faithful.


Those who wish to participate in this holy hour organized by French faithful may do so  by offering an hour, half an hour , even just a quarter of an hour. Remember that night prayer is especially pleasing to God ! Wherever possible, likeminded faithful might try to organise the hours in such a way as to fill the night.


In prayerful union


PS Please circulate this message as widely as possible. Thank you

Franciscan Friar of the Immaculate Defends Vatican II

There has been much talk of late regarding the way the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate have been treated by Rome.  Whereas I agree that Rome is not fond of Tradition and that there is truth that this lack of fondness has displayed itself strong against the Franciscan Friars, we must keep in mind that the Franciscan Friars are not exactly integral defenders of Tradition.  As a matter of fact, they view the Second Vatican Council as being in continuity with Tradition.  This is not to say that the Franciscan Friars are getting what they deserve, but they are simply an element of that revolution instigated by the Council and therefore cannot be trusted doctrinally, even though many of their members display solid Catholic piety.


Below is a video published in January 2011 in which Fr. Peter Damian Fehlner begins a short series in defence of the Council.  Let us recall also that these same Franciscan Friars were promoted by La Porte Latine (official website of the SSPX District in France) for a short period of time back in late 2010 – an early sign of the demise of the Society of St. Pius X.


Declaration by Fr Fuchs



Fr. Martin Fuchs, SSPX


With a very heavy heart, I communicated to the Superior General my resignation from the Society St. Pius X on 30 December. In all eternity I will be grateful to Archbishop Lefebvre for the Catholic Faith and for the priesthood! With regret, however, I have had to realise in recent years that they have deviated bit by bit from the path laid out by him:


  1.  The “Te Deum” in thanksgiving to the Motu proprio in which the Tridentine Mass was inextricably linked with the mass of Paul VI and in which the acceptance of the Second Vatican Council was demanded. Up until recently one could read on the internet that at the Priory St. Pius X in Munich the ‘Holy Mass (in the extraordinary form)’ was offered. In the seminary I learnt that we read the mass in the Tridentine rite, there is no ordinary or extraordinary rite, this is a completely untenable construct of Pope Benedict XVI. He who talks of an extraordinary rite, consequently must have in mind and accept an ordinary rite, the new mass.


  2.  The gratitude for the lifting of the excommunication of the four bishops. Archbishop Lefebvre said at a press conference in 1988: “So we are excommunicated by modernists, by people who would have been excommunicated by the preceding popes. What is this? We are condemned by people who have been condemned and who should be publicly condemned. That leaves us indifferent.” Archbishop Lefebvre always regarded the excommunication as null and void. But what is null and void does not need to be lifted. – Besides, with the lifting the injustice perpetrated against Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer continues to remain in force.


  3.  The willingness to negotiate with Rome, although Archbishop Lefebvre already laid out clearly and unequivocally under which conditions this should happen in future. “Supposing that Rome calls for a renewed dialogue, then, I will put in conditions and ask: Do you agree with the great encyclicals of all the popes who preceded you? Do you agree with Quanta Cura of Pius IX, Quas primas of Pius XI, Humani Generis of Pius XII. Are you in full communion with these popes and their teachings? Do you still accept the entire Anti-Modernist Oath? Are you in favour of the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ? If you do not accept the doctrine of your predecessors, it is useless to talk! As long as you do not accept the correction of the Council, in consideration of the doctrine of these popes, your predecessors, no dialogue is possible. It is useless.” (Fideliter Nr. 70)


  4.  The bringing forward of a practical arrangement without a doctrinal clean-up of the heresies of the Second Vatican Council. In a spiritual talk on 21 December 1984 the Archbishop said: “So the canonical issue, this purely public and exterior issue in the Church, is secondary. What matters, it is to stay within the Church … inside the Church, in other words, in the Catholic Faith of all time, in the true priesthood, in the true Mass, in the true sacraments, and the same catechism, with the same Bible. That’s what matters to us. That’s what the Church is. Public recognition is a secondary issue.”


  5.  Again and again I had to realise that no clear language was being spoken any more. So the second intention in the rosary crusade reads: “for the return of Tradition into the church…”. What is meant by “the church”? The Catholic Church as she was founded by Jesus Christ or the post-conciliar church? If it means the Catholic Church then no return is possible because Tradition is an integral part of the Catholic Church; if the post-conciliar church is meant then it is her who left Tradition. Then it is her who has to return to Tradition, not Tradition to the church.



These are the main reasons which have led to my decision. Despite warnings from the three auxiliary bishops, Bishop Williamson, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais and Bishop de Galarreta, despite warnings from the Society of the Good Shepherd, despite the knowledge of the attitude of Pope Benedict XVI, where nothing would move forward without the acceptance of the Second Vatican Council, the talks and negotiations were continued.

One might argue: “Our Superior General did not sign anything.” – But he would have been ready for an agreement, without having solved the doctrinal differences, as his letter from 17 June 2012 proves. They were ready for the worst, but Rome did not want it. – Trust in the Superiors is now somehow shaken, it is destroyed.


At this point, I thank with all my heart my dear faithful for all your prayers and sacrifices, with which you have supported my priestly ministry. Gladly I recommend myself also in future to your prayers,


Fr. Martin Fuchs

Jaidhof, 5 January, 2014

Boycott the Rosary Crusade


Catholics! Defend the Honour of Your Heavenly Mother!

Do not allow her name to be taken in vain once again!

Oppose the hypocrisy and deceit of yet another Menzingen ‘rosary crusade’!


We call upon all our readers, friends and supporters, and as many of the Catholic world as wish to please Heaven to boycott Menzingen’s latest bogus ‘rosary crusade’ and to spread the word amongst family, friends and Catholic acquaintances.


The Evidence:


1. Previous Rosary Crusades were an insult to the Mother of God. It is not only that they  brought evil in their wake, but that the evil was then blasphemously attributed to Our Blessed Lady. 

2007 – the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum of Benedict XVI relegates the Traditional Mass, (the Roman Rite of Mass) to a second place ‘extraordinary form’, behind the Novus Ordo which is said to be the ‘ordinary form,’ and claims that the Novus Ordo is in continuity with Tradition.Bishop Fellay declares that this was obtained by the Mother of God in answer to the prayers of the first Rosary Crusade.

2009 – Rome announces the “lifting” of the “excommunications” from the four SSPX Bishops. This is a falsehood, since both the SSPX and Rome know very well that no excommunication was ever really incurred to begin with, hence there is nothing to “lift”.What’s more, Archbishop Lefebvre and Bishop de Castro Mayer who also (supposedly) incurred the fictitious “excommunication” were completely forgotten and nowhere mentioned. Once again, Bishop Fellay claimed that this insulting lie was obtained by the Mother of God.

2012 – Timed to coincide with the end of the last Rosary Crusade, the already secretly planned sell-out deal with modernist Rome was intended to have been the miraculous “fruit” of this Rosary Crusade. In the end, however, it appeared to have been momentarily thwarted by one bishop, a handful of priests and some naughty laymen who would not sit down and be quiet.

2014 – ?


2. Heaven is not pleased by insincere, hypocritical, fraudulent prayers.

Whilst Bishop Fellay is making a show of publicly asking the faithful to pray for “the protection of the Traditional Apostolate”, he himself and his henchmen are the very ones causing the most harm to the Traditional Apostolate.

What sort of apostolates is he talking about? Let us take one example. In the Letter to Friends and benefactors which introduced this rosary crusade, Bishop Fellay says:

“In a world that is increasingly hostile to keeping the commandments of God, we must have a genuine concern for forming well-tempered souls who take their sanctification and salvation to heart.  This quite naturally leads us to give a great deal of attention to our schools and to their development. … Throughout the world, priests and religious are dedicating themselves to the magnificent task of Catholic education and teaching in more than one hundred institutions.”

Is he sincere or are these the smarmy words of a sly, cynical politician? Consider the fact that one of his “magnificent” schools openly promotes religious liberty. That another school in France published a prayer book which included the Luminous Mysteries. We could go on.

Elsewhere he says:

“At this time our dear priests are traveling through the world to minister to still more believers who discover us and call on us for help.  The priests…do not suffice for the missions that we have started. […] Oh Lord, give us priests!”

This from the man who has expelled so many priests in the last few years for standing up to his own tyranny, for sticking to the principles of the founder of the Society of St. Pius X, or even for as little as preaching a sermon against the general idea of compromise with one’s enemy (as in the case of Fr. Hewko).

There are many more examples, but even one would be bad enough. Making a public show of asking for something whilst at the same time working against that very same thing is not going to call down the blessing of God. Quite the contrary. Whatever the true intention behind this rosary crusade, it is not the one publicly stated.


3. The second intention is Accordist. Its wording has already been tampered with by various district superiors, in an attempt to hide that fact from their faithful.

Bishop Fellay’s first language is French, and he it was who annoucned the Rosary Crusade and its intentions. As given by DICI in the original French, the second intention is:

“Pour le retour de la Tradition dans lEglise”

(For the return of Tradition within the Church)

This version is what can be found in the original letter to friends and benefactors, on the French version of DICI, on the Swiss district website in French and on the German and Italian district websites in their respective languages (“für die Rückkehr der Tradition in der Kirche”; “Per il ritorno della Tradizione nella Chiesa”;).


However in the English speaking world, on the British, US and Asian district websites the second intention is being promoted as:

“For the return to Tradition within the Church”

which obscures the fact that what is being asked of the Virgin Mother of God is that “Tradition” (which in French is shorthand for the SSPX, all its apostolates and its allied religious communities) may return into the Church (as if it is not already in the Church!)

Worse still, the French district, although originally presenting the second intention as it was originally worded, have since re-worded it so as to make the French reflect the English wording, claiming that the second intention is:

“Pour le retour à la Tradition dans l’Eglise”

That this is something which has been done solely for the benefit of the faithful of the French district there can be no doubt, as evidenced by the fact that the original French version can still be seen on and on the Swiss District website. Furthermore, we learn that the Polish and South American districts have each come up with their own distinct wording of the second intention. The Polish District website is promoting a rosary crusade for:

“o uznanie praw Tradycji w Kościele”

(For the recognition of the rights of Tradition in the Church)

 Whereas the South American District is promoting a rosary crusade,

“Por el retorno de Roma a la Tradición católica”

(“For the return of Rome to Catholic Tradition”.)

So which is it? Aparrently there are now four separate rosary crusades. Clearly that last one sounds best, but the point is that is not the intention announced by Bishop Fellay. It is hardly surprising that various district superiors might feel the need to re-word Bishop Fellay’s intention, but that is merely another exercise in deceit.


For all the above reasons it is clear that any Catholic who wishes to do the Will of God, to please Heaven or to Honour the Blessed Virgin Mary can have no part in this initiative whatsoever. The SSPX has been cursed with disunity and blindness. Its priests do not agree with one another and find themselves having to be careful about what they say to whom, a thing unthinkable until fairly recently. This latest Rosary Crusade is a grave insult to Almighty God and to His Blessed Mother. It will call down from Heaven not a blessing but a curse, it will not delay or soften the chastisement but will hasten it, and although Bishop Fellay as the originator bears the most responsibility, it is incumbent upon each of us not to participate in such a serious insult to God. Furthermore, it is the clear Catholic duty of each of us to warn as many others a possible. In the meantime, pray for the survival of Tradition through the work of the Resistance and for the frustration of Bishop Fellay’s plans and those of his confederates.

Queen of the Most Holy Rosary, pray for us!




Priests and Faithful Should Not Support the Neo-SSPX – Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer

Here is an extract of a sermon given by Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer in Kansas City, Missouri on March 10, 2013.  This was shortly after the publication of the abominable April 15, 2012 Doctrinal Declaration of Bishop Fellay.  Here are a couple of Father’s quotes:


“The Priests, by their silence, give consent.”


“It is not correct for those who know the truth to continue to attend Society of St. Pius X mainstream Masses.”


You can directly listen to the audio by left clicking on the “Play” button.  If you prefer to download the audio file to your computer, right click the “Play” button and then left click the “Save audio as” option.