In a recent thread titled “Addition to CCCC” on the forum called “CathInfo”, the original poster points out, amongst other things, that there are two conclusions that the neo-SSPX has dropped in its current FAQ regarding the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP). The two conclusions are the following:
1. They are therefore Conciliar Catholics and not traditional Catholics.
2. That is why a Catholic ought not to attend their Masses.
Now this should be no surprise coming from the neo-SSPX. However, it should have come as a surprise to the owner of a forum that alleges it to be the “de-facto discussion headquarters for the SSPX Resistance” that His Excellency Bishop Williamson, of whom the same forum owner dubs as the “true successor of Archbishop Marcel Lefebfvre”, negates conclusion #2 in Issue 505 of his Eleison Comments where he writes:
“…..in my opinion, be content to attend the least contaminated Tridentine Mass that there is anywhere near you,…..”
This statement of His Excellency can also be used to argue that he implicitly negates conclusion #1. After all, if one may attend the Masses of the FSSP, how can it be claimed that its priests are Conciliar Catholics and not Traditional (true) Catholics?
Nevertheless, there was a not a peep at that time coming from the owner of CathInfo in opposition to Bishop Williamson’s words. Then again, this really should come as no surprise either. After all, the same forum owner, even before Issue 505 came out, promoted (and continues to do so) a booklet published by Mr. Sean Johnson which tries, but fails miserably, to defend Bishop Williamson’s comments that it is morally acceptable to actively attend the New Mass under certain circumstances.
My friends, CathInfo is a false resistance forum. If you want a true Resistance forum, I encourage to visit The Catacombs.
Screenshots of CathInfo pages mentioned in this post: