Scientific Education, Exact and Inexact is taken from Volume XIX (1894) of The American Catholic Quarterly Review.
“…..the idea that any manifest heretic could validly hold office is, as I prove in Volume One of this work, contrary to the doctrine of the universal magisterium of the Church, and also rests on the heretical premise that a manifest heretic (i.e. one who is manifestly a formal heretic) would still be a member of the Church until he is judged a heretic by juridically competent ecclesiastical authority.”
Kramer, Paul. To Deceive the Elect: The CatholicDdoctrine on the Question of a Heretical Pope (Kindle Locations 56-58). Kindle Edition.
“I have demonstrated (in Volume One) that the Church teaches de fide, that the manifest sin of public formal heresy constitutes a defection from the Catholic faith, which by its very nature separates the heretic from the body of the Church; and as a consequence, any officeholder in the Church (including the pope if that were possible), who would publicly defect from the faith into heresy, would automatically lose office ipso jure, as is set forth in Canon 194 §1. 2° (of the 1983 Code of Canon Law).”
Ibid. (Kindle Locations 59-63). Kindle Edition.
“According to can. 188.4° of the 1917 Code, any holder of whatsoever office who publicly defects from the Catholic faith into heresy loses office automatically, even before any judgment is pronounced by the competent authority. The opinion that an obstinate public heretic retains office, or remains a member of the Church until he is judged, is contrary to the Catholic faith.”
Ibid. (Kindle Locations 84-87). Kindle Edition.
Testimony of the Greek Church to Roman Supremacy is taken from Volume XIX (1894) of The American Catholic Quarterly Review.
THREAD: The chief intellectual difficulties which many have regarding understanding how Benedict's renunciation is valid, are many, and it merits listing them to understand them better >
— Veri Catholici: Benedetto 16 il Papa unico rimasto (@VeriCatholici) April 11, 2019
This canonical presumption's existence can be proven by its effect, namely, that NONE OF THE CARDINALS have demonstrated that the resignation is valid, & that the Vatican has not published ever an argument for the validity. Their silence testifies to the existence of presumption
— Veri Catholici: Benedetto 16 il Papa unico rimasto (@VeriCatholici) October 11, 2019
Religious Persecution is taken from Volume XIX (1894) of The American Catholic Quarterly Review.
“On March 17, 2015, I spent the day with Fr. Nicholas Gruner in Slane, Ireland, not knowing that it would be the last time we would ever meet on this earth. One of the last things he said to me was to ask me again to systematically present in book form the argumentation and evidence proving that Pope Benedict XVI did not validly resign from the office of the papacy, and demonstrate that he is still the only legitimate Pontiff of the Roman Church.”
Kramer, Paul. To Deceive the Elect: The Catholic Doctrine on the Question of a Heretical Pope (Kindle Locations 43-46). Kindle Edition.
“It may come as a surprise to many that Fr. Gruner believed that Benedict XVI, and not Francis, is the only valid Pope of the Catholic Church…..”
Ibid. (Kindle Locations 133-134).