“Now, therefore, we declare, say, determine and pronounce that for every human creature it is necessary for salvation to be subject to the authority of the Roman Pontiff.”
(Pope Boniface VIII, 1302)
Indifferentism is taken from Volume XX (1895) of The American Catholic Quarterly Review.
In this post on a thread regarding the validity of Novus Ordo ordinations, the Administrator (hereon Admin for short) of The Catacombs Forum made a remark that seemed out of touch with the topic at hand, so I asked for clarification in this post. The Admin responded to me in this post (see also screenshot at the bottom of this article). However, before responding to me, the Admin informed me privately that the subject of Benedict XVI still being pope would not be allowed to be discussed on the forum. Here is the reason based on what the Admin wrote in the response post:
“P.S. Some of you are aware that The Catacombs does not permit debates on Sedevacantism. It is widely and frequently debated elsewhere but here, we simply follow the line of Archbishop Lefebvre. The Resignationist opinion is also not up for debate here. As mentioned above, it ultimately and logically leads to sedevacantism. The Church will speak on both issues once a good pope is on the Throne of St. Peter and dispel the mist of confusion over these issues. May Our sweet Mother hasten that day!”
So, according to the Admin, the position that Benedict XVI is still pope ultimately and logically leads to Sedevacantism. This is incorrect. It does not logically lead to Sedevacantism; rather, if Pope Benedict XVI ends up dying with most of the Catholic world still accepting Jorge Bergoglio as pope, as they do now, then the Chair of Peter would, as a matter of fact, become empty. This hypothetical outcome would be only accidentally related to the classical definition of “Sedevacantism”. That accidental relationship would consist of both Sedevacantists and “Resignationists” (as termed by the Admin) holding that the Chair of Peter is empty; that’s it. The same accidental relationship occurred between Sedevacantists and the rest of the world at the period of time between the death of Pope John Paul II and election of Pope Benedict XVI. Therefore, the Admin is wrong to prevent debate on The Catacombs Forum on the false conclusion that the “Resignationist” position logically leads to Sedevacantism.
As a result of the false conclusion derived by the Admin, the Admin cannot resort to using Archbishop Lefebvre in defense of the Admin’s position. The position that Benedict XVI is still pope is simply a matter of canon law and of fact. What happens in the future is in God’s Hands, but we cannot overlook canon law and fact because of what may happen in the future. Now canon law requires that for a pope to validly resign, he must resign his office. Pope Benedict XVI did not resign his office. Therefore, he is pope. I have demonstrated this in my paper.
Both the Admin and I agree that Benedict XVI was elected pope in 2005. However, the Admin today states that Jorge Bergoglio is pope, whereas I today state that Benedict XVI is pope. Since the Admin has changed positions:
I challenge the Admin of The Catacombs Forum to justify the change in position.
Are you, Admin, up for that challenge? And will you allow me to rebut any response from you on The Catacombs Forum? After all, that’s what forums are mainly for.
Source: https://archive.org/details/SeraphicFatherStFrancisOfAssisi/page/n6 (pp. 248 to 250)
Is not this prophecy so indicative of the current state of the Church? It is so sad that the “elect” of the Catholic Resistance holds Jorge Bergoglio as pope thereby keeping priests and faithful in a material schism. May their blindness be removed and may they come to the truth that Benedict XVI is the true pope.
To the Rulers and Nations of the World is taken from Volume XIX (1894) of The American Catholic Quarterly Review.
“…..the Church bases its law on loss of office for public defection from the faith into heresy on the fact of the defection alone; and not on whether or not a crime, i.e. a penal delict, has been committed in the act of defection; and juridically declared.”
Kramer, Paul. To Deceive the Elect: The Catholic Doctrine on the Question of a Heretical Pope (Kindle Locations 694-696). Kindle Edition.
The Supernatural and Its Imitations is taken from Volume XIX (1894) of The American Catholic Quarterly Review.
“The Petrine ministry…while preserving its substance as a divine institution, can find expressions in various ways according to the different circumstances of time and place.” – Cardinal Ratzinger (as Prefect of the CDF), Communionis Notio, 28 May 1992, p.18.
“At this moment in the Church’s life, the question of the primacy of Peter and of his Successors has exceptional importance as well as ecumenical significance. John Paul II has frequently spoken of this, particularly in the Encyclical Ut unum sint, in which he extended an invitation especially to pastors and theologians to “find a way of exercising the primacy which, while in no way renouncing what is essential to its mission, is nonetheless open to a new situation”…
“The pilgrim Church, in its sacraments and institutions, which belong to this age, carries the mark of this world which is passing”. For this reason too, the immutable nature of the primacy of Peter’s Successor has historically been expressed in different forms of exercise appropriate to the situation of a pilgrim Church in this changing world…The Holy Spirit helps the Church to recognize this necessity, and the Roman Pontiff, by listening to the Spirit’s voice in the Churches, looks for the answer and offers it when and how he considers it appropriate.
“Consequently, the nucleus of the doctrine of faith concerning the competencies of the primacy cannot be determined by looking for the least number of functions exercised historically. Therefore, the fact that a particular task has been carried out by the primacy in a certain era does not mean by itself that this task should necessarily be reserved always to the Roman Pontiff…
“In any case, it is essential to state that discerning whether the possible ways of exercising the Petrine ministry correspond to its nature is a discernment to be made in Ecclesia, i.e., with the assistance of the Holy Spirit and in fraternal dialogue between the Roman Pontiff and the other Bishops, according to the Church’s concrete needs. But, at the same time, it is clear that only the Pope (or the Pope with an Ecumenical Council) has, as the Successor of Peter, the authority and the competence to say the last word on the ways to exercise his pastoral ministry in the universal Church.”
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger,Prefect, CDF, Primacy of the Successor of Peter in the Mystery of the Church (published in L’Osservatore Romano, Weekly Edition in English, 18 November 1998, pages 5-6).
The Newest Darwinism is taken from Volume XIX (1894) of The American Catholic Quarterly Review.