How much more evidence do you need before admitting that Jorge Bergoglio is not pope and never was?
Most often when we hear about the errors of Russia we think of communism. However, there is an error that Russia has carried for one millennium: schism. It is this error, albeit not in the same way, that the Resistance (i.e., those that oppose the changes made by Bishop Fellay and the superiors of the neo-SSPX) has adopted since 2013 when Jorge Bergoglio was allegedly elected to the papacy. This is because Jorge Bergoglio is not and never was pope. Benedict XVI has been the true pope since 2005. Nevertheless, the Resistance priests and faithful (not all of them), over seven years later, continue to hold Jorge Bergoglio as pope despite the sufficient evidence to the contrary. It is ironic that they pray for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary; yet, they themselves hold to an error from which they ask Our Lady Russia be converted.
Dear Resistance, please:
GET OUT OF YOUR MATERIAL SCHISM!
I wish you all a most blessed Feast of St. Margaret Mary Alacoque!
Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us.
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us.
St. Joseph, pray for us.
Dear Readers of Ecclesia Militans,
It was on this day one year ago that I went public in asserting that I hold Benedict XVI as the true pope. One year later I do not regret my decision one bit. As a matter of fact, I am more certain of it today. Deo gratias!
For those of you who still accept Jorge Bergoglio as pope, please understand that you are at least in material schism. If you know that Benedict XVI is the true pope, but willingly acknowledge Jorge Bergoglio as the true pope (for whatever crazy reason), then you are in formal schism. If you choose to be ignorant (for whatever crazy reason), then your ignorance is vincible. Therefore, you may as well consider yourself in formal schism.
For those who are seeking the truth, the truth is not difficult to attain. It boils down to this: the 1983 Code of Canon Law states that a pope must do “X” to validly resign. However, Benedict XVI did not do “X”. Therefore, he is still pope. Here is the argument in syllogistic format.
Don’t worry. You won’t become a Sedevacantist if Pope Benedict XVI dies before Jorge Bergoglio. That is the nonsense that people, including those in the Resistance, try to scare you with. They change the meaning of the term “Sedevacantist” as the modernists changed the meaning of terms to fit their own delusions. If Pope Benedict XVI ends up dying before Jorge Bergoglio, we will be in a period of sede vacante as in any other time in history between the reign of true popes.