I have been accused by a few people that I am no longer in line with Archbishop Lefebvre because I now accept Benedict XVI as the true pope. Really? How do they know that Archbishop Lefebvre would undoubtedly accept Jorge Bergoglio as pope? They make the Archbishop some kind of static character who would always accept the general consensus of who is pope despite evidence to the contrary. This is a false characterization of the man. Did the Archbishop accept the general consensus of the Vatican II Council Fathers? No. So don’t fall for it if you too accept Benedict XVI as the true pope or are leaning towards this fact. This is a matter of evidence and the evidence clearly shows that Benedict XVI did not renounce the office (munus). Therefore, he is still pope.
Fr. David Hewko regarding Bishop Williamson (and others) because of his errors:
“We gotta call the wolves, wolves. But pray for them.”
Fr. David Hewko regarding the Fake Resistance bishops being silent on Bishop Williamson’s error regarding the New Mass:
“Every one of them is silent against the error that it’s okay to go to the New Mass if it nourishes your faith. This is poisonous doctrine.”
This is a good decision on The Catacombs’ part. The Catholic Resistance must continue with no compromises.
Thank you, Fr. Hewko, for your courage in doing the right thing.
You may download here a partial text of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s conference to the seminarians of St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in the United States on April 28, 1983. The topics are listed on the first page.
You may download here a text of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s conference to the seminarians of St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary in the United States on April 26, 1983. The topics are listed on the first page.